Is your training plan actually any good?

Add your plan

Paste the text, drop a txt or PDF, or upload photos of your plan. Several days at once is fine.

Get your score

We score muscle coverage, weekly volume, frequency, progression and recovery against the training evidence.

Read the verdict

A coach-style verdict explains what is strong, what is weak and the one thing to fix first.

We map every exercise to a major muscle group (legs, back, chest, shoulders, arms and core) and check nothing is skipped.

Plans that quietly drop legs or back build imbalances and raise injury risk. A good plan trains the whole body across the week.

We add up the hard working sets each muscle gets per week.

Growth scales with volume up to a point, roughly 10 to 20 hard sets per muscle per week. Far below barely moves the needle; far above just piles on fatigue.

We compare how much volume each trained group gets against the others.

Even with everything covered, hammering chest while legs run on scraps builds strength and physique imbalances that catch up with you.

We read any effort cues you give: reps in reserve, RPE, percentages of your 1RM, or "to failure".

Hard sets near failure drive growth. Light, submaximal work like 5x10 at half your 1RM barely counts, no matter how many sets. No effort cues means we cannot fully judge it.

We look for a progression scheme, adding weight, reps or RPE over time.

Without progressive overload your body has no reason to adapt, and results stall within a few weeks.

We check how often each muscle is trained per week.

For the same weekly volume, hitting a muscle about twice a week beats once.

We check the week leaves real room to recover.

Muscle is built during recovery. Training every day with no rest raises injury and burnout risk without extra gains.